On Bugs and Linux Quality

[Karl Goetz]

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 19:53 +1000, Daniel Mons wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Blindraven wrote:
> | *shrug*
> |
> | I agree fully with the op.

trim

> It should be mentioned that a common criticism of RedHat Enterprise
> Linux is that it moves quite slowly.  They are slow to adopt new
> features, and are extremely conservative when it comes to making
> changes.  The upside of course is that upgrades are predictable and that
> sudden changes in the system that will break things are unlikely.  I
> prefer Ubuntu (and Debian) simply for their faster adoption of new
> features, and their brilliant "APT" package manager.  But again, the
> downside of a fast-moving system is the occasional software hiccup.

Surely your not saying Debian stable has "faster adoption" then Red Hat
EL? Or were you refering to release turn around time?
kk

> 
-- 
Karl Goetz <karl at kgoetz.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-au/attachments/20080626/ace9a53b/attachment.pgp