spam (was Re: Eee-PC 900 in AU?)

[martin fricke]

It wasn't spam. Somebody's been working too hard in their business and  
needs to take a few deep breaths.


------------
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:21:10 +1000, Dave Hall <ubuntu at skwashd.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 20:55 +1000, Gabriel Noronha wrote:
>
>> "btw this is not prior commercial communication, so it doesn't give you
>> an out for spamming me again the future."
>>  Someone has gotten bored and read the anti-spam act. :P
>
> Not bored, I run a business, and so I need to be aware of my legal
> obligations, so I can cover my arse.  Knowing the act also makes it
> handy when you want report spam to ACMA - see
> http://submit.spam.acma.gov.au/acma_submit.cgi :P
>
> Cheers
>
> Dave