spam (was Re: Eee-PC 900 in AU?)

[Dave Hall]

On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 20:55 +1000, Gabriel Noronha wrote:

> "btw this is not prior commercial communication, so it doesn't give you
> an out for spamming me again the future."
>  Someone has gotten bored and read the anti-spam act. :P 

Not bored, I run a business, and so I need to be aware of my legal
obligations, so I can cover my arse.  Knowing the act also makes it
handy when you want report spam to ACMA - see
http://submit.spam.acma.gov.au/acma_submit.cgi :P

Cheers

Dave