[ubuntu-art] ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 45, Issue 71

Wed Mar 25 11:49:25 GMT 2009

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ubuntu-art-request at lists.ubuntu.com>
To: <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 2:43 PM
Subject: ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 45, Issue 71


> Send ubuntu-art mailing list submissions to
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ubuntu-art-request at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ubuntu-art-owner at lists.ubuntu.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ubuntu-art digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re:  Jaunty backgrounds (Kenneth Wimer)
>   2. Re:  [Breathe] system-search (Cory K.)
>   3. Re:  [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Cory K.)
>   4. Re:  [Breathe]media-floppy (Cory K.)
>   5. Re:  [Breathe] system-search (Oliver Scholtz 1)
>   6. Re:  [Breathe] system-search (Cory K.)
>   7. Re:  [Breathe] software update (Cory K.)
>   8. Re:  [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Thorsten Wilms)
>   9. Re:  [Breathe] audio-input-microphone (Cory K.)
>  10. Re:  [Breathe] software update (Oliver Scholtz 1)
>  11. Re:  [Breathe] system-search (Oliver Scholtz 1)
>  12. Re:  [Breathe] software update (Cory K.)
>  13. Re:  [Breathe] software update (Cory K.)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:10:49 +0100
> From: Kenneth Wimer <kwwii at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty backgrounds
> To: ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <200903241610.49707.kwwii at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 07:56:02 Matthew Lye wrote:
>> I figure as the deadline for jaunty backgrounds has passed there are
>> no new submissions being accepted. Being that I was late I haven't
>> created a page but I have included the background I was looking at.
>>
>> Please let me know if submissions are still possible, and if I should
>> submit this via the wiki.
>>
>> You can do anything you set your mind to when you have vision,
>> determination, and and endless supply of expendable labor.
>>
>> <No tree's were harmed during this transmission. However, a great
>> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced>
>
> Sorry, but the artwork for Jaunty as close to final. Work on Karmic will 
> start
> soon, so keep an eye out for that!
>
> --
> Ken
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:34:08 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C8FD70.7060301 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has
> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so far.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:41:18 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C8FF1E.7060808 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote:
>>> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know.
>>>
>>
>> Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted
>> system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons.
>>
>
> I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective
> within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's
> important enough to commit to policy/a guideline.
>
>> Likely the orientation you used there happens to feel right for right
>> handed people (?)
>>
>
> Heh. Maybe, but I don't think it's worth worrying about. (lefties are
> only about 10% of the population. screw 'em) :P
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:43:45 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe]media-floppy
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C8FFB1.9060807 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> daniel planas armangu? wrote:
>> I made some small modifications to fit better. not perfect but I think
>> it delivers.
>>
>
> Are you happy with this one? Will you be focusing on other removable 
> media?
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:44:22 +0100
> From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <scholli_tz at yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1237909462.20489.2.camel at kubuntu>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.:
>> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has
>> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so 
>> far.
>>
>>
>> -Cory K.
>>
>
> Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;)
>
> The desicion is only in:
>
> - old-style Loupe?
> - new-style Loupe?
>
> Sincerely Oliver
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:52:09 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C901A9.2040107 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.:
>>
>>> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it has
>>> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so 
>>> far.
>>>
>>
>> Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;)
>>
>> The desicion is only in:
>>
>> - old-style Loupe?
>> - new-style Loupe?
>>
>
> That's a design choice there. And really, it's better you finish 1 thing
> at a time. gtk-media-* would be great to have completed.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:57:04 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C902D0.4050901 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> daniel planas armangu? wrote:
>> I think the software update icon deveria be orange. This maintains the
>> human eye.
>>
>
> I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow
> is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it
> really stands out badly.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:17:55 +0100
> From: Thorsten Wilms <t_w_ at freenet.de>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone
> To: ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID: <1237911475.10193.6.camel at charly>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:41 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote:
>> >> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted
>> > system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons.
>> >
>>
>> I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective
>> within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's
>> important enough to commit to policy/a guideline.
>
> It is important for every case where you will see several such icons.
> Having some / and other \ introduces unrest.
>
>
> -- 
> Thorsten Wilms
>
> thorwil's design for free software:
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:28:27 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] audio-input-microphone
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C90A2B.7070905 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:41 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>>
>>> Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:12 -0300, spg76 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll consider it. If this important? Sorry but I just don't know.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Only if there are no other considerations. Now that you posted
>>>> system-search, we have to think of the orientation of all such icons.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm unsure if this is important. I could see consistency in perspective
>>> within a given category but left/right orientation? I'm unsure it's
>>> important enough to commit to policy/a guideline.
>>>
>>
>> It is important for every case where you will see several such icons.
>> Having some / and other \ introduces unrest.
>>
>
> *If* they were going to be sitting along side each other in some
> particular set, like "Categories" or "Mimes" I would agree. But as these
> icons will sit in the menu generally amongst upstream app icons, where
> there are no such guidelines, I don't think it's so important.
>
> I won't dictate here. I'll just leave it up to the folks who draw.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:37:49 +0100
> From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <scholli_tz at yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1237912670.23126.2.camel at kubuntu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:57 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>> daniel planas armangu? wrote:
>> > I think the software update icon deveria be orange. This maintains the
>> > human eye.
>> >
>>
>> I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow
>> is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it
>> really stands out badly.
>>
>>
>> -Cory K.
>>
>
> Yes it's a Inkscape-rendered version you use ... hmm I will retouch the
> small sizes again for that it renders better with Inki.
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:42:23 +0100
> From: Oliver Scholtz 1 <scholli_tz at yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] system-search
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <1237912943.23126.7.camel at kubuntu>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:52 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>> Oliver Scholtz 1 wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, den 24.03.2009, 11:34 -0400 schrieb Cory K.:
>> >
>> >> Oliver, I think that Sebastien's submission is the one for now as it 
>> >> has
>> >> a sharper quality/feel that is consistent with the rest of the set so 
>> >> far.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Make system-search2 sharper wouldn't be a real problem. ;)
>> >
>> > The desicion is only in:
>> >
>> > - old-style Loupe?
>> > - new-style Loupe?
>> >
>>
>> That's a design choice there. And really, it's better you finish 1 thing
>> at a time. gtk-media-* would be great to have completed.
>>
>>
>> -Cory K.
>>
>
> okay okay :)
> But Seba jumped to it firstly and I thought only what the community
> would prefer more, so I did the second quickly ... :) ... back to
> gtk-media.
>
> Oliver
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:48:44 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C90EEC.7010206 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Oliver Scholtz wrote:
>> On Di, 2009-03-24 at 11:57 -0400, Cory K. wrote:
>>
>>> I could go either way really, What is really at issue is that the shadow
>>> is inconsistent and jagged. (on both versions) I'm using it now and it
>>> really stands out badly.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Yes it's a Inkscape-rendered version you use ... hmm I will retouch the
>> small sizes again for that it renders better with Inki.
>>
>
> No. Not at all. It's visible on the wiki as well.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:43:43 -0400
> From: "Cory K." <coryisatm at ubuntu.com>
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] software update
> To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork <ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Message-ID: <49C91BCF.1040301 at ubuntu.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Oliver Scholtz wrote:
>> *fixed
>>
>
> Nice. Now look at it vs. Daniel's version. The hard shadows on this new
> one are gone.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> -- 
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>
> End of ubuntu-art Digest, Vol 45, Issue 71
> ******************************************
>