[ubuntu-art] [Breathe] Merge trunk and packaging branches?
Andrew SB
a.starr.b at gmail.com
Sat Jul 18 01:31:14 BST 2009
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Cory K.<coryisatm at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is mostly a question for AndrewSB.
>
> I'm wondering if there's any reason why a BZR branch set up for Debian
> packaging couldn't be considered an upstream? (as this is a native
> package and we do it in Studio)
>
> If there is nothing glaring, I'm inclined to merge the two to reduce
> some of the redundancy. We would do all our work there and I suspect the
> build system would just ignore the other files/folders.
>
No reason at all. I always though it was a bit redundant. None of the
other files will be installed to the binary or end up on the user's
system. In fact, having that stuff in the source package is probably a
good thing as it would contain the complete one-canvas source SVGs. We
could even add render_bitmap.py to the build process so that the
package it truly "built from source."
We should do go ahead and do this after the release...
- Andrew
More information about the ubuntu-art
mailing list