[ubuntu-art] Human 2 .deb

[Michael Stephenson]

2008/7/28 shadowh511 <shadow.h511 at gmail.com>

>
>
>
>
> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <nemes.sorin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ok,
> >
> > now just imagine that I can't observe that.
> > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded.
> >
> > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity
> >
> >
> > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <shadow.h511 at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <nemes.sorin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for  * or for ..other *.. ;)
> >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's
> >>> normal
> >>> to be that way.
> >>>
> >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are
> >>> interested in emerald aspect of life,  will test new the new deb and
> >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem.
> >>>
> >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on
> >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ??
> >>>
> >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way
> >>>
> >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <sephiroth7vii at gmail.com>:
> >>>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat
> >>>> more
> >>>> powerful than GDM .
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <shadow.h511 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we
> >>>>> switched to
> >>>>> emerald?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ubuntu FTW!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> ubuntu-art mailing list
> >>>>> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> >>>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> ubuntu-art mailing list
> >>>> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> >>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> ubuntu-art mailing list
> >>> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> >>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> >>
> >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory
> >> like
> >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara)
> >> It uses more memory per window than metacity
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ubuntu-art mailing list
> >> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nemes Ioan Sorin
> >
> > --
> > ubuntu-art mailing list
> > ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
> Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>

Optimized for Vista = Multicore CPU and 4 gigs of ram.... hmmm how does that
make emerald which you claim to be a resource hog less appropriate on a
system optimized for a resource hog?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20080728/5fa117d1/attachment.htm