<div dir="ltr">2008/7/28 shadowh511 <<a href="mailto:shadow.h511@gmail.com">shadow.h511@gmail.com</a>> <div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:48 PM, SorinN <<a href="mailto:nemes.sorin@gmail.com">nemes.sorin@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > ok, > > now just imagine that I can't observe that. > Emerald works OK - no memory / CPU overloaded. > > CPU is about 1 to 5 % with Emerald ..the same with Metacity > > > 2008/7/28 shadowh511 <<a href="mailto:shadow.h511@gmail.com">shadow.h511@gmail.com</a>>: >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2008, at 11:00 PM, SorinN <<a href="mailto:nemes.sorin@gmail.com">nemes.sorin@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >> >>> man shadowh511 -> peoples just ask here for  * or for ..other *.. ;) >>> being a discussion list they had all rights to do that and it's >>> normal >>> to be that way. >>> >>> for example Kim told us about the progress of his theme. Which are >>> interested in emerald aspect of life,  will test new the new deb and >>> will put here their opinions regarding the * emerald problem. >>> >>> Peoples that are are not interested in emerald themes ...will go on >>> without disturb the others ... so what's the problem ?? >>> >>> I don't understand what's your reason to respond / speak that way >>> >>> 2008/7/27 Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) <<a href="mailto:sephiroth7vii@gmail.com">sephiroth7vii@gmail.com</a>>: >>>> Well, you don't have to use it, but emerald certainly is somewhat >>>> more >>>> powerful than GDM . >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:05 PM, shadowh511 <<a href="mailto:shadow.h511@gmail.com">shadow.h511@gmail.com</a>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> this might sound like a stupid question, but why have we >>>>> switched to >>>>> emerald? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ubuntu FTW! >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>>>> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >>>>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>>> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >>>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Nemes Ioan Sorin >>> >>> -- >>> ubuntu-art mailing list >>> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >>> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> >> >> I personally reccomend not using emerald because it drinks memory >> like >> someone that just came out of a desert. (think sahara) >> It uses more memory per window than metacity >> >> >> -- >> ubuntu-art mailing list >> <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> >> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> >> > > > > -- > Nemes Ioan Sorin > > -- > ubuntu-art mailing list > <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> > <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </div></div>Please imagine you are running emerald on a system optimized for vista -- <div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">ubuntu-art mailing list <a href="mailto:ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com">ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com</a> <a href="https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art" target="_blank">https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art</a> </div></div></blockquote></div> Optimized for Vista = Multicore CPU and 4 gigs of ram.... hmmm how does that make emerald which you claim to be a resource hog less appropriate on a system optimized for a resource hog? </div>