[ubuntu-art] Consideration on Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Theme

[Gianluca Sartori]

2006/11/23, Troy James Sobotka <troy.sobotka at gmail.com>:
>
> On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:15 +0100, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> > Style and Coherency
>
As you can
> imagine, the icons take a good deal of effort.  Currently, the bulk of
> the icons were contracted by sabdfl and built by the IconFactory.  If
> someone were to construct a set of panel icons that met sabdfl's
> approval, it is possible they could be included.  This is not an easy
> endeavor however.  ;)


Do you think that the idea of a flat macos-like set of icons for the panel
would be accepted by the sabdfl? I can invest time to do them, but only if
it's not an already lost battle.. BTW, what's _your_ opinion about it?

> Colors
> The palette has never been used to the best of my knowledge.  There is
> currently _no_ official palette for Ubuntu.


I read your page on Ubun2. To me a palette is one of the first things to do
when dealing with consistency beside to style guidelins. These are my top
priorities when designing something. I think that we absolutely need a well
defined palette.

> Beryl
> I believe if you read the last UWN you will see some information on the
> newest Feisty related Compiz elements.


Okay

> Window Manager
> I believe some of the limitations are inherent in GNOME.  You would
> either need to address them with code or formalize a bug report for
> change


Okay

Hope this helps,
> TJS


Yep, it helped. I'm new to the community, so probably some points I talked
about were obvious to you.

Cheers,
Gianluca

--
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20061123/fa80c904/attachment-0001.htm