[ubuntu-art] Kubuntu.org look - really not a feast for the eyes

[Matthew Nuzum]

On 7/2/06, Martin B. <necteno at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As for the articles contained therein: I think that the content is not
> really in our hands, nor should it be (or we'd call this list something
> other than -artwork) :-)
>
>
> I think the articles should be made by the doc team hand in hand with the
> artwork team. Web pages are not documentation, the visual appearance is as
> important as the content (IMO). Furthermore, the visual style and content
> cannot be made separately, because it complements one another (at least
> here, in a visual presentation of a product).
>

I've noticed that there is a product on launchpad (recently added
apparently) called Kubuntu-website. You can find it here:
https://launchpad.net/products/kubuntu-website

I've talked to Riddell and we agreed to set the contact for the bug
reports to be the ubuntu-website team, found here:
https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-website

That means bugs filled against the ubuntu or kubuntu websites will
notify people who are part of that team.

We're not quite ready yet to redesign the websites, but there are
tasks available. And I'd expect that as we get organized more stuff
will appear there.

This also means that if you see something on the website that needs
addressed, the bug tracker for ubuntu or kubutu website is an
excellent place to file it.

Oh, by the way, I've recently started working on the Canonical team as
the ubuntu (et al) webmaster.

If you'd like to contact me I'm on freenode as newz2000.

-- 
Matthew Nuzum
www.bearfruit.org
newz2000 on freenode