REJECT: pkgme

[Jamie Strandboge]

Hi,

I'm sorry to inform you that pkgme is being rejected for the following
reason:
 * debian/copyright says that all files are GPL-2, however 
   setup_helpers.py is LGPL and several others are GPL-3. Please use 
   the licensecheck command and update debian/copyright accordingly
 * debian/changelog lists the uploader as 'pkgme developers 
   <pkgme-devs at lists.launchpad.net>'. This is highly unusual and is
   not strictly true. While the uploader may be in pkgme-devs, all of
   pkgme-devs did not upload this package. It is important that the
   uploader be listed as an actual person and the package signed by
   this person.
 * the package does not provide a watch file. While this is the
   preferred method, if this is not possible, please consider adding a
   comments only watch file, a README.source file with clear 
   instructions on how the source tarball was generated or use 
   get-orig-source in debian/rules. This is required to verify the 
   integrity of the source package.
 * the checksum for pkgme_0.1.tar.gz does not match that at 
   https://launchpad.net/pkgme/trunk/0.1/+download/pkgme-0.1.tar.gz/+md5
 * the package is a native package. Usually this is a mistake. The 
   packaging should instead use an orig.tar.gz and a version of the 
   form 0.1-0ubuntu1. Doing this would also fix the previous issue.

After making these changes, feel free to reupload.

Thanks!

-- 
Jamie Strandboge             | http://www.canonical.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/attachments/20120615/2eee4995/attachment.pgp>