Rejecting squeak-sources3.9

[Martin Pitt]

Hi Jordan,

I reject squeak-sources3{,.9}:

 * The tar.gz does not have any copyright statement.
 * The package should not be native, since Ubuntu/Debian is not
 * upstream.

Why do we need the old squeak-sources3, too? If 3.9 is the only
version in Hardy, then we don't need the older 3.7 sources? Also, the
sources3 package name should be a little less confusing, maybe 3.0 or
3.7 or so.

Thanks,

Martin

-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

My 5 today: #103831 (hal-info), #120413 (hal-info), #191737 (hal-info),
#94924 (hal-info), #114443 (hal-info)
Do 5 a day - every day! https://wiki.ubuntu.com/5-A-Day
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/attachments/20080229/8c47f7d5/attachment.pgp