Micro Release Exception request for ubuntuone package set

[Martin Pitt]

Hello Rodney,

Rodney Dawes [2012-06-14 10:01 -0400]:
> Ditën e Tue, 05/06/2012 më 17.25 +0200, Martin Pitt ka shkruar:
> > In the first case you should point out how you can verify the actual
> > .debs in -proposed, in a full Ubuntu environment (as that can/will
> > look differently than sandboxes during package build, and packages in
> > PPAs). In the second case you'd keep the individual bug verification,
> > but should justify why UI/feature changes are necessary.
> 
> We have our own QA resources on Ubuntu One, and have them install
> all the -proposed packages in a full Ubuntu in a VM to test. We
> generally do this anyway, as waiting for original reporters to verify
> fixes may never happen.

Based on this, a successful history of new microreleases in -proposed,
and a working QA process in U1 (which I have experienced myself during
my time in ~ubuntu-sru) I +1 this.

I just learned that a single +1 from any TB member is sufficient to
grant an MRE. I was not aware of that before, and was waiting for the
next TB meeting to finish this. Sorry for the delay!

Wiki updated:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions?action=diff&rev2=21&rev1=20

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/attachments/20120619/1992d99c/attachment.pgp>