Updating SRU exception for hal-info
John Dong
jdong at ubuntu.com
Tue Aug 3 06:16:27 BST 2010
Well I guess the difference is there's previous kernel choices in GRUB the user can fall back to :)
On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:51:08PM -0400, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 12:03 -0400, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>> We don't restrict SRUs of any other packages out of concern that the
>>> toolchain will be broken, and the SRU exception for hal-info (and
>>> subsequently udev) doesn't wave the requirement of regression-testing and a
>>> waiting period. Surely splitting the keymaps back out would be an
>>> artificial and cumbersome separation, and sets a /more/ strict standard than
>>> for our other SRUs?
>
>> Most other packages don't break boot in quite so critical and
>> difficult-to-fix ways when they break? :-)
>
> Like the kernel, which we SRU on a roughly monthly schedule? ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
> slangasek at ubuntu.com vorlon at debian.org
More information about the technical-board
mailing list