sounder Digest, Vol 81, Issue 56

[Christopher Chan]

On Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:47 PM, Samuel Thurston wrote:

> But I have always considered "LTS" to be kind of a joke anyway.  I
> mean, if you have no support contract, what obligation does
> Ubuntu/Canonical have to support you, long term or otherwise?
> Contractually, the answer is zero, regardless of which release cycle
> you use.
>

Yeah, my feelings exactly. LTS does not sound what it one might think it 
means. You have to find out what Canonical means by LTS.