Macs

[Odd]

Michael Haney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Odd <iodine at runbox.no> wrote:
>> No one is denying that.
>>
>> It's interesting how you avoid commenting on anything that
>> disputes your statements in previous mails. I can only assume
>> you have no answers, and you're afraid to admit you were wrong.
>> You're fast losing any credibility you might have had.
>>
> 
> I'd rather now reply to people who seem to like stiring up trouble and
> starting arguments.

You don't like people challenging your beliefs. That's fine.
But for the future you may want to check your facts before putting
them on a public list where they can easily be picked apart by people
with more knowledge than you. This is the second time now.

> Instead of politely commenting on my statements
> you chose to be condescending and outright hostile.  You lost a great
> deal of credibility with me almost immediately.

Well, I'll try to be nicer in the future, OK? Perhaps you
can do a little fact checking? Win-win you see.

> The article citing the Mac as being able run Vista faster than most
> other PC hardware was in the print version of Maximum PC and PC
> Magazine (and was some time ago too), and I haven't been able to find
> an online version or I would have put it in my initial email.  Perhaps
> I should have stated that the first time.  I stand by my comments
> because I've seen it myself first hand.

Yes, I believe you have seen that article. Vista is a dog, so it
doesn't surprise me. I did not know it was a print article.

> Nearly everyone I know has a
> Mac and my exposure to them is very high.

I don't see how that is relevant to your claims.

> You shouldn't attack people because you don't like Macs.

I don't like Macs? What makes you say that? They are perfectly
fine PCs, just like Dell's. Overpriced, yeah. But that's just a
fact. I wish you wouldn't lie about me.

-- 
Odd