cutting up a post

[Steve Furbish]

Douglas Pollard wrote:
> IF anyone cares to go back and look I stated that what I wrote was a not 
> a legal argument. Here again you took out and posted a small part of my 
> statesmen that had no meaning without the rest of the statement. It is 
> out of context.  I see you as one the cannot make an argument so instead 
> seeks to distort anthers.  You call my arguments silly, look at your 
> statement, "Get a lawyer and sue". WoW!  This also out of context, do 
> you see what I mean.
>                                                                          
>                                                             Doug
>
>   
With all due respect Douglas I cared enough to look and yet saw no such 
disclaimer openly stated in your little sub-thread. Nobody had to chop 
your post to remove it because it wasn't clearly stated in the first 
place. You did, however, mention  or use the words "right", "copyright", 
"court", and "creative common" which have the natural tendency of 
implying a legal argument. Furthermore, as one who has testified 
thousands of times in court I can assure you that  breaking up a long 
statement into it's shorter components is a very common tactic employed 
by legal professionals in their "legal arguments". My suggestion if you 
do not want your posts dissected and discussed - don't hit send.

Steve