Why sounder?

[Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists)]

On Thu, October 8, 2009 18:20, Nils Kassube wrote:
> Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists) wrote:
>> On Thu, October 8, 2009 16:34, Nils Kassube wrote:
>> > Amedee Van Gasse (on Ubuntu mailing lists) wrote:
>> >> Why sounder? My question wasn't off topic...
>> >
>> > If you set a reply-to header for sounder, some folks will follow
>> > your desire. Didn't you have a similar problem before?
>>
>> That only proves that reply-to is broken and people should use
>> reply-to-list. It's their problem, not my problem. I was just
>> curious.
>
> But why do you set a reply-to header in the first place? And why a
> reply-to sounder if you send a message to ubuntu-users? If your mailer
> can't work without adding a reply-to header, can't you at least use
> individual addresses for each list? I mean, it is not a real problem but
> at least a bit confusing.

I am already doing that.