mail to individuals

[Odd]

Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 23:51 -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> 
>> I say that at least Claws mail works correctly, others have said that
>> their clients work correctly.  If it is the list that is broken how is
>> it possible that some clients work and others do not?  
>>
>> That is my only claim; that since some mailer proggies do and some do
>> not, it is the proggies, not the list config, that is at fault.
> 
> I agree, any list munging the Reply-To header is broken; being tired
> of stating things over and over again, have a look at Chip Rosenthal's
> 
>    http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

How does one person stating your exact arguments on a webpage
change anything? He's just as wrong as you..

> btw, on most lists I'm subscribed to that munge Reply-To a majority uses
> Thunderbird.  Does this observation tell something about brokeness ?

Yes, that most people disagree with you.

-- 
Odd