Binary incompatibility of Linux distributions

[Chan Chung Hang Christopher]

John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Cybe R. Wizard <cybe_r_wizard at earthlink.net
>   
>> wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>> On Wed, 13 May 2009 14:44:26 -0600
>> "Karl F. Larsen" <klarsen1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>>  Bill Gates and Microsoft jumped around and offered Windows 3.1 which
>>> ran on top of DOS, and was pretty poor but cheaper and a lot of
>>> people bought 3.1 including me. This was before Linux.
>>>       
>
>
> Sounder tends to get the tail end of a number of random discussions
>
> For those subscribers of sounder who don't know what windows 3.1 has to the
> with binary incompatibility of Linux distributions it may be useful to give
> a link to the original discussion
>
> http://www.linux-archive.org/ubuntu-user/299765-binary-incompatibility-linux-distributions.html
>
> Or not. After reading that I still don't see how the jump from market share
> to desktops was made.
>
>   
You should see that start then...

http://www.linux-archive.org/ubuntu-user/298923-future-ubuntu-linux-will-make-micky-oft-go-bankrupt.html