Sounder mailing list etiquette and future direction
lproven at gmail.com
Fri Dec 4 18:25:56 GMT 2009
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Nils Kassube <kassube at gmx.net> wrote:
> Liam Proven wrote:
>> Part of the nature of humour, free-ranging discussion and learning is
>> sarcasm, irony & a modicum of gentle mockery. Prevent me from using
>> these techniques, you are restricting my freedom of expression. When
>> I am restricted from expressing myself, in effect, I consider myself
>> to be censored, and I am not tolerating that.
>> OTOH, the chap here that kept issuing some kind of muslim dedication
>> - that is violently offensive to me, as a hardcore atheist. I am not
>> posting any message dedicated to anyone's god, nor am I even
>> replying to one. I myself would move for a total ban on all mention
>> of any religion, including those to me rather hateful sigs
>> proclaiming that people espouse any particular variety of primitive
> Isn't a "total ban on all mention of any religion" the same kind of
> censorship that you don't tolerate?
My point is, one can ban mention of certain words, or even certain
concepts if one wishes, and if people play along & follow the rules,
it can work.
But trying to limit how people can express themselves - to say that
there are not only things one can't say, but ways one can't say them,
whole modes of expression that are not allowed - that, for me, is a
step too far.
I can avoid profanity and I generally avoid name-calling as a matter
of principle, but if I am not allowed to occasionally say "you're an
idiot" to an idiot, then I really can't be bothered to play any more.
Liam Proven • Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/liamproven
Email: lproven at cix.co.uk • GMail/GoogleTalk/Orkut: lproven at gmail.com
Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 • Cell: +44 7939-087884 • Fax: + 44 870-9151419
AOL/AIM/iChat/Yahoo/Skype: liamproven • LiveJournal/Twitter: lproven
MSN: lproven at hotmail.com • ICQ: 73187508
More information about the sounder