Invitation to ubuntu developers
mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
Sun Nov 26 14:41:23 GMT 2006
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 01:39:51PM +0100, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
(reply-to: set to sounder)
> * The drivers don't violate the GPL
Before people make pronouncements about whether or not anything we ship
breaches the GPL, it would be helpful if they could provide their legal
credentials and background in copyright law. The issues here are
complicated and unclear, and it's unlikely that anyone can give a
definitive statement about whether or not the drivers we ship are a
legal problem or not.
What we *can* say is that nobody feels that any GPL-violations on
Ubuntu's behalf are sufficiently clear-cut that they've threatened legal
action. Which may mean that they don't violate the GPL, or may mean that
nobody is willing to risk the costs involved in losing a case.
> * If you call the reaction the 'binary driver decision' caused a
> shockwave, then what should we call the reaction caused by the patent
> deal? Armageddon?
This is really not the place to discuss non-technical issues relating to
other distributions. I doubt that sounder is either.
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the sounder