Getting rid of terminology

[Gustavo Niemeyer]

Trust me, you want *that* specific "Part" dead as well! :-)

This is not the snapcraft concept you're thinking of.
On Mar 10, 2016 6:49 PM, "Mark Shuttleworth" <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 10/03/16 06:33, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> > -- Part
> >
> > This term as previously discussed was one of the types that were used to
> > refer to snaps. Let's use Snap or SnapInfo where appropriate.
>
> No, there's is a big difference between a snap and a part.
>
> A snap is made of parts, but a part is not a whole snap.
>
> We want parts to be an independent concept (much like the new "layers"
> in charms) because they are points of collaboration between parties with
> a common interest, that still let those parties reuse those shared bits
> inside unique snaps.
>
> Mark
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20160310/ebebdf66/attachment-0001.html>