Files OS Snap provides

[Alexander Sack]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, John Lenton <john.lenton at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 4 November 2015 at 06:29, Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> We do, it's called "Ubuntu Server" ;)
>
> Um... if this is what Snappy Ubuntu Core needs to be, we need to go
> back and check; as I understand it we started from the *core* seed,
> not the server seed, and have been adding and removing things with ---
> as far as I know, but don't take my word for it --- very little
> oversight beyond the technical.
>
> The diff today, in xenial, between snappy core and server is
> interesting: ignoring the versions and libraries, you get
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/13111850/
>
> Do we need to fix this?

The manifest of server is an installer image and doesn't even have ssh
etc., so its a bad starting point for finding a good base to
consolidate around ...

Much better is to align LXD and core first (as both are kernel-less
rootfs'es) and then see how we can derive the other images from there
with at minimal changes.

Could you make a diff of core vs. LXD manifest and also compare the
footprint of those two?

 - Alexander

>
> --
> snappy-devel mailing list
> snappy-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel