Snappy image size

[Alexander Sack]

Hi,

iirc, we prefill both partitions (A and B) for our ARMHF prebuilt images,
because the first update would otherwise be super slow if we had to copy
the whole FS to the B partition on SD-cards.

It makes no difference on the total disk footprint of an install though...

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Manik Taneja <manik.taneja at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just wondering as to why is there such a big difference between the images
> for amd64 vs armhf platforms-
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
> source <http://releases.ubuntu.com/vivid/>
>
> Also, what's the difference between the 2 images for the same platform?
>
> Regards,
> Manik
>
> --
> snappy-devel mailing list
> snappy-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/snappy-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20150611/3b60b4f0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 104041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/attachments/20150611/3b60b4f0/attachment-0001.png>