Classic confinement and core_dynamic_linker
Joseph Rushton Wakeling
joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Tue Jan 17 22:17:27 UTC 2017
On 17/01/17 22:22, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
> For classic confined snaps to link, they either need to be part of core or staged into your snap. On system libraries are ignored completely to ensure you have a working snap in the end.
Is that a work in progress constraint, or is it the intended long term
behaviour? (I'll try it out shortly in any case.)
I ask because currently, if a package is explicitly stated as a build
dependency, then with `strict` confinement it's automatically included in the
final snap where necessary. What makes `classic` confinement unable to
automatically handle the inclusion of build dependencies in the same way?
More information about the Snapcraft