Jordi Mallach
jordi at canonical.com
Tue Oct 18 10:10:52 CDT 2005
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:40:15PM +0200, Erdal Ronahi wrote:
> If, on the other hand, you translate gnome-panel directly for the 2.10,
> 2.12 or HEAD branch (for example) in the /products/gnome-panel/series/
> type of URLs, that template will most probably be owned by the GNOME
> translators. If you're not part of that team, your translations will
> become suggestions.
> Well, that might be the case, since the problem became virulent in the
> evolution-2.4 template. But the ownership of this template is not different
> from, say, gnome-config, where .po import worked smoothly. Please compare
>
> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/breezy/+sources/evolution/+pots/
> evolution-2.4/ to
> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/breezy/+sources/gconf-editor/+pots/
> gconf-editor/
Right, same permissions. Carlos, what's a good reason for these two
templates to act differently when uploading files?
> Yes, I am part of the team. I am its current leader and I have access to the
> GNOME CVS. So if I want to stomp on other guys translations, I can quite easily
> :)
Heh :)
> No, serious, where can I apply to become GNOME translations in Rosetta? Here?
It's done!
Jordi
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/
jordi at sindominio.net jordi at debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/rosetta-users/attachments/20051018/864d55ba/attachment.pgp
More information about the rosetta-users
mailing list