roll back / more options for .po import

[Jordi Mallach]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:00:27PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> Hmm... is Ubuntu translation locked down at all? Perhaps we should do
> this? We have the ability to require that people be in designated
> translation teams to translate.
> 
> Carlos, Jordi: perhaps we should also create another "level" of locking,
> where we allow people to translate freely in languages that DO NOT have
> a designated translator, but lock those that DO have a designated
> translator. Make sense? That means that languages could quickly get
> going, and when people have made substantial translations they can say
> "OK, we'll become a designated translation team" and then stop people
> from stomping on their translations as happened here.

Mark, do you think we should prepare a BoF to discuss this during UBZ?
In general I think it's a good idea, but there are some QA issues
related to it, I guess.

Jordi
-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez  --  Debian developer     http://www.debian.org/
jordi at sindominio.net     jordi at debian.org     http://www.sindominio.net/
GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/rosetta-users/attachments/20051007/4785924e/attachment.pgp