Rosetta Legalese

[JanC]

On 8/2/05, || स्वक्ष  || svaksha <svaksha at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/2/05, Steve Alexander <steve at canonical.com> wrote:
> 
> > The fact that the source code to Rosetta is not available does not
> > change the status of translations produced with the help of Rosetta.
> > It is very rare that the tools you use have any effect on the status of
> > the end product.
> 
> If so, then why has Rosetta not been accepted by Debian which has
> chosen to go with Pootle instead. Without getting pedantic, is it not
> in some way related to possible legal issues at some point.

Because they want to run it on their own servers probably?

BTW: SourceForge isn't open source either.
(An old version was released as open source, but they changed a lot since then.)

-- 
JanC