motu-release will revert libgems-ruby to the old state.

[Soren Hansen]

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 06:32:54AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> While the particular action wasn't one that had needed to be taken
> before, I don't find it particularly conceptually novel.

Frankly, this both concerns and surprises me.

> If you will look, you will find that in Feisty we released with
> Universe packages still building and so the final package version can
> vary per architecture because there was no coordination of the end
> game of the release for Universe.  Starting with Gutsy, this is no
> longer true.  

I don't see the point of this?

> For Gutsy and Hardy (and I expect Intrepid unless someone decides
> because there is no written rule we aren't permitted to do anything)

Noone is suggesting that.

> motu-uvf/motu-release coordinated with ubuntu-release, developed
> schedules, and deadlines and issued them to MOTU for when uploads
> needed to be finished and approved individual uploads in the last day
> or two before the archive froze (these were clearly not UVFe/FFe) in
> the interests of having a consistent archive at release.  

This sounds very clearly like something I'd expect motu-release to be
doing.

-- 
Soren Hansen               | 
Virtualisation specialist  | Ubuntu Server Team
Canonical Ltd.             | http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/motu-council/attachments/20080903/0c2fade6/attachment.pgp