Summary of the discussion about Marco Rodrigues

Daniel Holbach daniel.holbach at ubuntu.com
Fri Dec 21 17:10:57 GMT 2007


On Do, 2007-12-20 at 19:46 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: 
> Personally I see it rather the opposite.  It seems to me that private 
> complaints to council members (not you) get nothing but platitudes and 
> requests to give it more time.  

It's fairly easy for me to recognise myself you're talking about.
Instead of commenting on the snide nature of your remark, I'll
acknowledge that it was partly my mistake not to make it the MC's
responsibility and think of a general process earlier. 

It's been a learning experience for all of us, but I still see the MC in
a better position for future problems today.


> Public complaints get nothing that hasn't 
> been tried before.  It's still not clear to me that there is a limit to 
> what level of disruptive behavior is OK.

There are a lot of different types of disruptive behaviour and I'm happy
to have a more general discussion about that. It's my firm believe that
the MOTU team will benefit from identifying those areas and having a
more natural reaction of "this is not acceptable" towards that.

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-motu/2007-October/002526.html
covers parts of what I'm referring to.


> From my perspective spending the time to engage the MC on this issue 
> appears to have been wasted.  I doubt I'll repeat the mistake.

I'm afraid I can't take this serious. You are threatening not to respect
the MC because after discussion and input from various people your
proposal wasn't chosen?

Please let's all take a look at the results in Mid-January and go from
there.

Have a nice day,
 Daniel





More information about the Motu-council mailing list