Request for MOTU Council to consider Marco Rodrigues (Kmos) not potentially suitable for MOTU

[Emmet Hikory]

On Dec 12, 2007 12:32 AM, Daniel Holbach  wrote:
> On Di, 2007-12-11 at 21:23 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> >     Completely separately from the above, and in this specific case,
> > I'd like to state that I find that ~ 70% of the issues Marco raises
> > are valid, although there are often small mistakes that require
> > investigation prior to application, and in many cases I find it takes
> > more time to investigate than it would to treat the consideration as a
> > unfinished bug report and perform the activities myself (which is not
> > my typical experience with submissions).
>
> Thank you for sharing this information. I also shared my view on this
> already, but do you feel the amount of work you put into fixing or
> explaining is much higher than that of other contributors in the
> sponsoring queue?

    I can't effectively answer this, as I don't have metrics.  On a
purely subjective level, and regarding only bugs I encountered in the
last couple months, I find that it takes me much longer to figure out
the reasoning behind the request than for the majority of other
contributors, but once the reasoning is understood (which may require
discussion with Marco), the time requirements are similar in terms of
checking the patch and either commenting or uploading.

-- 
Emmet HIKORY