False info on Mir's project page
cemil.azizoglu at canonical.com
Fri Jul 11 07:12:59 UTC 2014
So you mean make devel == trunk. Now you've opened a can of worms... :-)
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Daniel van Vugt <
daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com> wrote:
> I am assuming that RTM != Utopic. RTM would be more stable fixed on 0.4
> while Utopic would be >=0.5.
> On 11/07/14 14:51, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
>> You know we could just let lp:mir/0.5 be the development branch and be
>> more careful about noticing ABI breaks (at which point we must branch).
>> Then everyone wins and lp:mir would be the development branch as well as
>> one for packaging in Ubuntu-next.
>> So long as distro releases didn't happen without warning, which I think
>> they can't as we'd have to approve changelog additions, then why not let
>> distro package from our latest and greatest code?
>> On 11/07/14 14:43, Cemil Azizoglu wrote:
>>> I raised this with the CI team. Well, they at least didn't shoot the
>>> idea down right away and were willing to consider it. sil2100 said he'd
>>> think over the consequences and get back to us.
>>> Apparently, there is an (un)written rule that one should be able to get
>>> the latest distro code by pulling from lp:projname, which we would be
>>> violated. I raised the point that it's important to have a coherent
>>> launchpad project page.
>>> We'll see what happens.
Mir Display Server - Team Lead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mir-devel