kevin.gunn at canonical.com
Wed Dec 11 18:46:21 UTC 2013
Hey Daniel -
I'm certainly not opposed..
I can't remember exactly why, but I believe its the release teams process
to add the date in when they insert it into archive.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Daniel van Vugt <
daniel.van.vugt at canonical.com> wrote:
> The current archive release of Mir is:
> But do we really need to keep all that date info? Surely all we really
> want is:
> It's just as unique, and less a jumble of numbers. It might also stop
> Launchpad from complaining:
> "Mir 0.1.2 is older than the current packaged version"...
> - Daniel
> Mir-devel mailing list
> Mir-devel at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mir-devel