Christopher James Halse Rogers
raof at ubuntu.com
Tue Apr 23 05:34:39 UTC 2013
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 16:33 +1200, Robert Ancell wrote:
> On 23/04/13 16:09, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> > I know I proposed this, but it feels ugly:
> > mir_connection_create_surface
> > And other people have mentioned the same.
> > What do people think about making construction a special case, like:
> > mir_create_surface
> > ?
> > I know tvoss did not like this. But what do other people think?
> I like mir_connection_create_surface - it's consistent with the other
> names and it's not likely to be used enough to warrant abbreviating.
Seconded. I've got my beefs with the client API, but this isn't one of
them. It's verbose, but not annoyingly so, and surface creation is
More information about the Mir-devel