mir_connection_create_surface

[Robert Ancell]

On 23/04/13 16:09, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> I know I proposed this, but it feels ugly:
>    mir_connection_create_surface
>
> And other people have mentioned the same.
>
> What do people think about making construction a special case, like:
>    mir_create_surface
> ?
>
> I know tvoss did not like this. But what do other people think?
>
I like mir_connection_create_surface - it's consistent with the other
names and it's not likely to be used enough to warrant abbreviating.