[Maas-devel] maas-images project
Andres Rodriguez
andres.rodriguez at canonical.com
Tue Jul 8 02:13:41 UTC 2014
I agree that having these in a separate project would be a good idea,
although, this may continue to cause confusion as people would potentially
file bugs against the 'maas' project. However, having a project that is
owned ~maas-maintainers would be preferable IMHO.
Hope this helps
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Scott Moser <smoser at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Hey,
> In the past I've maintained maas ephemeral images, and used the maas
> project for that code (well, being maintained from a
> lp:~smoser/maas/<something>).
>
> This has caused confusion on where exactly to file a bug against
> the images, as they're not maas code (see http://pad.lv/1337538 for
> example).
>
> I'd like to get rid of ~smoser in the source for that and put a
> team/project explicitly in charge of that code. The code is currently at
> https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/maas/maas-ephemerals-v2
>
>
> My 2 suggestions:
> a.) keep using 'maas' as the project
> Agree on an upstream branch location:
> lp:~maas-maintainers/maas/maas-ephemerals
> Agree that bugs in maas images are explicitly maas bugs.
> b.) make a new project
> I'd just create a new project called 'maas-images' and add a team
> maas-images-maintainers that owned the code.
>
> I don't have strong feelings. I would tend to lean toward 'b' only
> because I think that the members of the projects might differ, but I dont
> think that is necessarily a problem.
>
> Thoughts?
>
--
Andres Rodriguez
Engineering Manager, HWE Team
Canonical USA, Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/maas-devel/attachments/20140707/96b32fe8/attachment.html>
More information about the Maas-devel
mailing list