<div dir="ltr">I agree that having these in a separate project would be a good idea, although, this may continue to cause confusion as people would potentially file bugs against the 'maas' project. However, having a project that is owned ~maas-maintainers would be preferable IMHO.<div>
<br></div><div>Hope this helps</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Scott Moser <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:smoser@ubuntu.com" target="_blank">smoser@ubuntu.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br>
In the past I've maintained maas ephemeral images, and used the maas<br>
project for that code (well, being maintained from a<br>
lp:~smoser/maas/<something>).<br>
<br>
This has caused confusion on where exactly to file a bug against<br>
the images, as they're not maas code (see <a href="http://pad.lv/1337538" target="_blank">http://pad.lv/1337538</a> for<br>
example).<br>
<br>
I'd like to get rid of ~smoser in the source for that and put a<br>
team/project explicitly in charge of that code. The code is currently at<br>
<a href="https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/maas/maas-ephemerals-v2" target="_blank">https://code.launchpad.net/~smoser/maas/maas-ephemerals-v2</a><br>
<br>
<br>
My 2 suggestions:<br>
a.) keep using 'maas' as the project<br>
Agree on an upstream branch location:<br>
lp:~maas-maintainers/maas/maas-ephemerals<br>
Agree that bugs in maas images are explicitly maas bugs.<br>
b.) make a new project<br>
I'd just create a new project called 'maas-images' and add a team<br>
maas-images-maintainers that owned the code.<br>
<br>
I don't have strong feelings. I would tend to lean toward 'b' only<br>
because I think that the members of the projects might differ, but I dont<br>
think that is necessarily a problem.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Andres Rodriguez<div>Engineering Manager, HWE Team</div><div>Canonical USA, Inc.</div></div>
</div>