[lubuntu-users] Is this it for Lubuntu QA Disco QA? (Israel)

[Israel]

On 2/5/19 12:08 PM, Fritz Hudnut wrote:
>
>
>     On 2/4/19 3:44 PM, Fritz Hudnut wrote:
>     > ...
>     >
>     (snip)
>     >
>     > Point is that there are over-lapping layers of complexity in the QA
>     > that just take "too much" time . . . . 
>
>     (snip)
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I would like to point out that this is a very valid point.  I remember
>     when I had much more available time to mess with things (like
>     lucid and
>     natty era). I found that the QA/bug reporting system seemed extremely
>     complicated.
>
>     apport should be specifically tuned to use the QA system, as well as
>     launchpad.
>
>     -- 
>     Regards
>
>
>     @Israel:
>
>
> Thanks for the comment . . . indeed it does seem like some
> "streamlining" of the process might help get more participation . . .
> possibly AI could run "over-watch" between LP bug reports and QA
> testing reports rather than fallible human intelligence????
>
> F
>
Hi Fritz,

I am not sure how much Canonical/Ubuntu uses AI (if at all), though
probably Ubuntu is used in some deep learning networks :)

The idea of using AI to run QA is a pretty interesting idea though.  I
wonder if any distros use AI?

-- 
Regards

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/attachments/20190206/73a3c9c4/attachment.html>