Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

Bhavani Shankar R bhavi at ubuntu.com
Sat Feb 9 14:35:34 UTC 2013


On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Laura Czajkowski <laura at lczajkowski.com> wrote:
> On 08/02/13 18:06, Martin Owens wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 19:43 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>>> But wont it be too harsh on other loco teams as it gives rise to a
>>> thinking that they are marked as inactive just because they might have
>>> forgotten/dint have time to update their wiki or portal page for some
>>> time whilst organizing events on a regular basis?
>> We've made the tools pretty easy, if there's no activity on the portal
>> page, then there's really no way to know 'online' if there is activity.
>> So an online-activity status must follow from online-activity, not from
>> offline-activity.
>>
>> We can't really measure offline-activity.
>>
>> Martin,
>>
>>
> No I think that's a bit unfair the loco council has looked at team
> report, blog posts, photos of events that happen off line and we make
> the judgement call.  Many people create events on the LTP, some don't
> but do add it to their website.   While it is not mandatory to use the
> LTP and many people do use it some teams prefer to use their own tools.
>

+1 Laura

Regards,

-- 
Bhavani Shankar
Ubuntu Developer       |  www.ubuntu.com
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi



More information about the loco-contacts mailing list