Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Rodrigo Rodriguez]

2013/2/7 Martin Owens <doctormo en gmail.com>

>
>
> On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 17:22 +1000, Jared Norris wrote:
> > On 7 February 2013 05:23, Laura Czajkowski <laura en lczajkowski.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >  A topic that comes up frequently on blog posts we've seen and also
> from
> > > talking to people is the word "Approved"LoCo it doesn't empower people
> at
> > > times. The feedback is that the word approved loco is not great to
> motivate
> > > others who have not been approved or at some point were approved and
> then
> > > not approved.
>
> My preference is for "Canonical Supported" and "Active". Activity can be
> automatically seen from the loco teams website and Canonical's support
> can be dished our with whatever metrics they'd like.
>

Doesn't "Canonical Supported" suggest the LoCo Team is sponsored by this
company?

And because the first term sound a little more comercial, I'll prefer the
second one ("Sponsored")

Cheers,

-- 
Rodrigo Rodríguez
http://mundonomada.info
__
Prohibido prohibir. La libertad empieza con una prohibición.
__
GPG key ID: 525B5B37
50A0 C0E4 3F79 424A 584F 046A 576B 0990 525B 5B37
------------ pr?xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130208/b77bc6d2/attachment.html>