Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Sergio Meneses]

Hi all!

I think "sponsored" or "verified" are the best words for our Loco Teams

Sergio Meneses
Linux User: #478743
Ubuntu User: #24056


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Randall Ross <randall at executiv.es> wrote:

> On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> > Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit :
> >>
> >> status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored
> >>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us
> > some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to
> > choose one of the proposition, I'll go with the Reviewed.
> >
> > But, in fact, if I think about it, I would prefer to name the
> > "unapproved/unverified/unevaluated/unreviewed/unsponsored" locoteams.
> > All the teams are locoteams and should be called that, without a
> > status. The unapproved are, for me, just teams who still need advices,
> > help, structure,… to fill or surpass the template of a locoteam. To
> > resume, if locoteams are Jedis, the unaproved teams are Padawans. I
> > can't give proposition, my english vocabulary is too poor for that,
> > and it's just my opinion.
> >
> > Big hug everyone and thanks for all the good work,
> >
> > YoBoY
> >
>
>
> +1 for "Sponsored"
>
> We should resist the temptation to assume that an "Unapproved" team is
> somehow deficient. Some "Unapproved" teams actually have a high level of
> activity and organization, and in some cases, other sponsorship models
> (even self-sponsorship).
>
> Cheers,
> Randall
>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130207/cc1bb9b6/attachment.html>