Coming up with another term for Approved LoCo Teams - Discussion

[Randall Ross]

On 13-02-06 11:47 PM, YoBoY wrote:
> Le 06/02/2013 20:23, Laura Czajkowski a écrit :
>>
>> status = Verified, Evaluated, Reviewed, Sponsored
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> It's great to see a change on this "approved" status (who just give us
> some CDs and gifts sometimes). I really like the idea. If I have to
> choose one of the proposition, I'll go with the Reviewed.
>
> But, in fact, if I think about it, I would prefer to name the
> "unapproved/unverified/unevaluated/unreviewed/unsponsored" locoteams.
> All the teams are locoteams and should be called that, without a
> status. The unapproved are, for me, just teams who still need advices,
> help, structure,… to fill or surpass the template of a locoteam. To
> resume, if locoteams are Jedis, the unaproved teams are Padawans. I
> can't give proposition, my english vocabulary is too poor for that,
> and it's just my opinion.
>
> Big hug everyone and thanks for all the good work,
>
> YoBoY
>


+1 for "Sponsored"

We should resist the temptation to assume that an "Unapproved" team is
somehow deficient. Some "Unapproved" teams actually have a high level of
activity and organization, and in some cases, other sponsorship models
(even self-sponsorship).

Cheers,
Randall

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130207/dbbf4e4c/attachment.pgp>