Ubuntu Moscow LoCo

[Sergio Meneses]

Hi everybody!

I see a lot of opinions and different points of view, this is always a good
thing! but as Pablo Rubianes said the LoCo Council must work on this, with
the help of this commentaries and of course with Ubuntu-RU leaders

We (LoCo Council) are working on this, in our last meeting with Ubuntu-RU
team we talk about this, as you can see in our minute:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/Minutes/20120717

In order to finish this message, I don't know why this message ended in the
lococontacts-mailinglist! and reading Laura's answer, I didn't see nothing
like "condescending" or something. I think Laura's mail is totally valid!

Remember, the LoCo Council is here to help! and if anyone has problems
about locoteams, please let us know without intermediaries.


Regards!



Sergio Meneses
Ubuntu LoCo Council


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Michael Hall <mhall119 at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 04/03/2013 01:41 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > ...
> > I think if we have a team in Moscow that is being active, we
> > should let them post their blog posts to loco.ubuntu.com
> > <http://loco.ubuntu.com> - why would we not want to expose their Ubuntu
> > contributions to the wider LoCo community?
> >
>
> Adding blogs to the LTP homepage isn't the issue, we can add any blog
> feed and assign it to any team.  If the Moscow team has a blog, we can
> add it to LTP under the Russian team (or even no team if we wanted).
>
> The bigger question is events and meetings, should the Moscow members
> use the Russian team for events and meetings?  As long as they are
> members of that Russian LP team they can do that in LTP.
>
> Michael Hall
> mhall119 at ubuntu.com
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20130403/5fb1bf05/attachment-0001.html>