Re-approvals for O-Cycle rules and overview

[Paul Tagliamonte]

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Marcus Moeller <marcus.moeller at gmx.ch> wrote:
> On 05/19/2011 07:25 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Marcus Moeller<marcus.moeller at gmx.ch>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's
>>>>>>> mostly outlined on the wiki[1]. If you need moreinfo or anything like
>>>>>>> that, please don't think twice about letting us know how we can help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I'm a bit confused, and I hope you can clarify.
>>>>>> The wiki page linked above mentions that the LoCo council will contact
>>>>>> the LoCo team. But as I read your mail below, the teams are to create
>>>>>> an application and send to the LoCo council and should not expect
>>>>>> direct contact from the council before doing this?
>>>>>
>>>>> We filed bugs and subscribed the owner of the LP team.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the launchpad bug the LoCo councils way of contacting the team, or
>>>>>> should we sit tight and wait for a more formal mail from a member of
>>>>>> the Council?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. It is our way of getting in touch with you. If we were to mail
>>>>> you, it'd be just as form-letterish and inhuman as bug mail.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, what is the advantage of marking the bug private? As I see it,
>>>>>> that only helps to move the process of re-approval from the entire
>>>>>> team, to the team contact.
>>>>>
>>>>> So that we (as the Council) can vote on it cleanly. We make them
>>>>> public after we vote.
>>>>
>>>> I meant to include this on the last mail. Please excuse that I
>>>> double-posted.
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-locoteams/+bug/673331
>>>>
>>>> That's an example of a "finished" re-app ticket. Please note it's
>>>> public and how we used it. If you need to add more to your
>>>> application, please add it on the Wiki. This is *only* to track the
>>>> process, not hold your application.
>>>
>>> Do you also attach the IRC logs on which the decisions are based, to the
>>> bug?
>>
>> Please look at the report, you'll find that we linked to logs :)
>
> Do you mean the LP bug (e.g. the above linked one) when you talk about
> reports? Because within that I cannot find the link (maybe I am blind, but I
> have re-checked twice).

LP. It's at the bottom of my mail starting with "True"

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-locoteams/+bug/673328


>
> Greets
> Marcus
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>



-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq