Re-approvals for O-Cycle rules and overview

[Marcus Moeller]

On 05/19/2011 07:25 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Marcus Moeller<marcus.moeller at gmx.ch>  wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you need more information regarding the re-approval process, it's
>>>>>> mostly outlined on the wiki[1]. If you need moreinfo or anything like
>>>>>> that, please don't think twice about letting us know how we can help.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/LoCoTeamReApproval
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I'm a bit confused, and I hope you can clarify.
>>>>> The wiki page linked above mentions that the LoCo council will contact
>>>>> the LoCo team. But as I read your mail below, the teams are to create
>>>>> an application and send to the LoCo council and should not expect
>>>>> direct contact from the council before doing this?
>>>>
>>>> We filed bugs and subscribed the owner of the LP team.
>>>>
>>>>> Is the launchpad bug the LoCo councils way of contacting the team, or
>>>>> should we sit tight and wait for a more formal mail from a member of
>>>>> the Council?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. It is our way of getting in touch with you. If we were to mail
>>>> you, it'd be just as form-letterish and inhuman as bug mail.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, what is the advantage of marking the bug private? As I see it,
>>>>> that only helps to move the process of re-approval from the entire
>>>>> team, to the team contact.
>>>>
>>>> So that we (as the Council) can vote on it cleanly. We make them
>>>> public after we vote.
>>>
>>> I meant to include this on the last mail. Please excuse that I
>>> double-posted.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-locoteams/+bug/673331
>>>
>>> That's an example of a "finished" re-app ticket. Please note it's
>>> public and how we used it. If you need to add more to your
>>> application, please add it on the Wiki. This is *only* to track the
>>> process, not hold your application.
>>
>> Do you also attach the IRC logs on which the decisions are based, to the
>> bug?
>
> Please look at the report, you'll find that we linked to logs :)

Do you mean the LP bug (e.g. the above linked one) when you talk about 
reports? Because within that I cannot find the link (maybe I am blind, 
but I have re-checked twice).

Greets
Marcus