No subject


Wed Aug 26 22:14:35 BST 2009


"If the work itself contains any copyright notices placed there by the
copyright holder, you must leave those notices in tact, or reproduce
them in a way that is reasonable to the medium in which you are
re-publishing the work."

The work itself (the .png graphic) doesn't contain any copyright
notice, so IMHO you're not violating the license.

http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FFAQ#How_do_I_properly_attribute_a_Creative=
_Commons_licensed_work.3F

>
> Cheers
> S=F8ren
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> If we as a community can't respect the license imposed by people
>>> inside our own community on artwork, how can we the expect others
>>> respect the license of the software, that seems to be so central to
>>> the whole Free Software movement?
>>
>> I totally agree with you on this.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> > It doesn't matter if it's code, artwork, literature or music; the
>>> > author
>>> > must always be acknowleged... just because they've made the software,
>>> > book,
>>> > web banner or song available to the public for free, does'nt mean the=
y
>>> > don't
>>> > deserve to be acknowledged for their hard work.
>>> >
>>> > If I follow your logic correctly, we should be removing all the
>>> > copyright
>>> > notices from the software we use, because it takes more disk space an=
d
>>> > can
>>> > become unhandy.
>>>
>>> In my other mail I specifically tried to argued that those two can't
>>> be compared. A few lines of text on one piece of paper take up a much
>>> bigger fraction of the face of the paper, than a text document on a
>>> harddisk.
>>
>> Usually, the copyright notice take up a tiny fraction of the brochure,
>> poster, cd label,or whatever. I'm sure that you can make some space for
>> it.
>> :)
>>
>>>
>>> > I don't want to be harsh, but if you're not going to respect the
>>> > license, do
>>> > your own artwork and publish it as PD or CC0.
>>>
>>> I think you miss understand me. I _do_ want to respect the license
>>> chosen by you (and other publishers). That is the whole reason why I
>>> bring up this subject.
>>>
>>> However I think more people would be able to use the graphics if
>>> another license was chosen. But of course the choice of license is
>>> solely for the author!
>>
>> The reason I choose CC-BY-SA was that it was the most common license on
>> the
>> SU site. But I'm willing to change it if you feel that the current licen=
se
>> prevents people from using the artwork.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> S=F8ren
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> The loco mailing list may not be the right forum for it, but maybe
>>> >> there needs to be a general discussion of what license to use for
>>> >> marketing material? Or it has already been had, and I have missed it=
?
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers
>>> >> S=F8ren
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Best,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Greg
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [0] http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Cheers
>>> >> >> S=F8ren
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 2009/8/21 Leandro G=F3mez <leo.telsen at gmail.com>:
>>> >> >> > 2009/8/21 Jono Bacon <jono at ubuntu.com>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> On 08/21/2009 12:10 PM, Leandro G=F3mez wrote:
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> >     Corrales to weave his magic? ;-)
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Yes indeed! Would anyone like to do these? Adolfo, could you
>>> >> >> >> > ask
>>> >> >> >> > Byron
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Made some badges based on Byron's artwork... threw in a coup=
le
>>> >> >> >> > of
>>> >> >> >> > web
>>> >> >> >> > banners as well... download (including sources) here:
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > http://www.mediafire.com/?gii7ghtym1y
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Those images look awesome! Good you attach them and add them t=
o
>>> >> >> >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGlobalJam - thanks!*
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Done! :)
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> *
>>> >> >> >>     Jono
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> --
>>> >> >> >> Jono Bacon
>>> >> >> >> Ubuntu Community Manager
>>> >> >> >> www.ubuntu.com / www.jonobacon.org
>>> >> >> >> www.identi.ca/jonobacon www.twitter.com/jonobacon
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> --
>>> >> >> >> loco-contacts mailing list
>>> >> >> >> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> >> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > --
>>> >> >> > loco-contacts mailing list
>>> >> >> > loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> >> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> --
>>> >> >> loco-contacts mailing list
>>> >> >> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > loco-contacts mailing list
>>> >> > loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> >> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> loco-contacts mailing list
>>> >> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > loco-contacts mailing list
>>> > loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> loco-contacts mailing list
>>> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>
>>
>> --
>> loco-contacts mailing list
>> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>>
>>
>
> --
> loco-contacts mailing list
> loco-contacts at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
>



More information about the loco-contacts mailing list