USA LoCo Consistency

[Joey Stanford]

Aaron Toponce wrote:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/<Full_state_name>Team
>     eg: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UtahTeam
> http://www.launchpad.net/~<full_state_name>team
>     eg: http://www.launchpad.net/~utahteam
> http://www.ubuntu-<full_state_name>.[org|com|net]
>     eg: http://www.ubuntu-utah.org
> http://ubuntu-<full_state_name>.ubuntuforums.org
>     eg: http://ubuntu-utah.ubuntuforums.org
> irc://irc.ubuntu.com/#ubuntu-<full_state_name>
>     eg: irc://irc.ubuntu.com/#ubuntu-utah
>
Colorado is currently in alignment with those except forums (we don't
have any) and website (ubuntu-rocks.org).
Chicago, however, is consistent with the regular LoCo naming. I
recommended this in passing to Rich and we was able to do it. That means
that at least our two groups are out of compliance with the larger folks
which are "ubuntu-<two letter country code>".

So, that's part of the issue right...at least Utah and Colorado did
similar things (truth be told, I based Colorado off of Utah due to the
problems in securing Ubuntu resources at the time).

I'd like to see Jono's proposal/desire. We can ask him to help push all
the requests through if it requires modifying distribution lists, web
locations, etc..

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/loco-contacts/attachments/20070121/72264a10/attachment.pgp