steve at rileyz.net
Sat Mar 29 15:59:48 UTC 2014
On 2014-03-29 at 15:52, Matthew Cliffe <mattjcliffe at gmail.com> wrote:
> You missed the point using it as an excuse it's wrong and allows for lazy
> and sloppy work. There is no such thing as the average system which makes
> it hard to target. As I said before the point it's do not use " well I have
> x resource so everyone else obviously does" as a reason for un optimized
I don't view Akonadi as lazy or sloppy. It (and Nepomuk, too) works very well on my machine. I have not looked at the source code, so I can't say for certain that the code either optimized or unoptimized. Perhaps the code is really bad, and abundant resources hide this. Or perhaps the code is already optimized, and 2 GB is simply not enough RAM.
Akonadi does more than Thunderbird. If Thunderbird is all you need, that's fine. But to trash Akonadi as unoptimized because it doesn't work well on low-resource machines is just wrong.
More information about the kubuntu-users