Which USB Scanners work?
Basil Chupin
blchupin at iinet.net.au
Wed Sep 29 06:25:17 UTC 2010
On 29/09/2010 13:11, Doug wrote:
> On 9/28/2010 10:06 PM, Ric Moore wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 18:05 -0400, FarSight Data Systems wrote:
>>
> /snip/
>
>>>> I'm using an *HP Photosmart C4280* with no problem except that the
>>>>
>>> scanning
>>>
>>>> button on the printer does not work and I must first open Xsan in
>>>>
>>> order to
>>>
>>>> scan.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I appreciate the advice, but I'm not looking for a printer, but a
>>> stand alone flatbed scanner. I have 2 printers which work perfectly
>>> fine with all the versions of Linux I've used for the past 8 years.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Scanner, not printer and definitely not an all-in-one.
>>>
>> For the price of a decent flatbed scanner, they throw in the printer for
>> free, expecting you to buy pricey ink. Just think of it as a thick
>> flatbed scanner. :) Ric
>>
>>
> Watch out! Someone else in this thread mentioned that he _had_ to buy
> ink so that the scanner would work. So even if you never printed
> anything on the hp, you might have to keep it in ink--which dries up
> relatively quickly. It would be typical of hp to tie the one to the
> other. I would definitely get the manual and read it carefully
> before committing to that machine.
>
> BTW, someone else in the thread liked the Epson V300 Photo. I
> have one, and I haven't used it on my Linux machine (no network,
> unfortunately) but in W7 it works really nicely, and fairly quick.
>
I did - mention the V300.
But I am curious: why the comment about a network?
I don't have a network of any description. There was no mention of any
network requirements by the OP - only the need for USB2.0 connectivity.
It *IS* quick. A *LOT* quicker than the Canon (of similar specs) which I
had. In fact, the difference surprised me.
BC
--
Sound that shatters silence is called noise. Sound that enhances silence is called music.
Chinese proverb
More information about the kubuntu-users
mailing list