Konq 4 chat
nigel at prayingforisrael.net
Sat May 23 14:30:44 UTC 2009
> On Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:53:54 nepal.roade at googlemail.com wrote:
>> You make good points Donn about how incredibly useful Konq had become by
>> then. The loss of this is exactly the reason I have decided to leave KDE
>> for good and adopt at least for now the Gnome Desktop.
> While you may agree with me -- I don't agree with you. I have learned (in this
> thread) that Konqueror is *not* being killed-off. It's still there and does
> everything it used to do. Sure, because of the KDE 4 thing, there is some
> functionality (very small bugs, Dotan has helped me list them) lost but really
> not that much.
> As usual with any software I am prepared to find the way to work with it. KDE
> 3.5 had its way. KDE 4 seems to have its too.
> I had to kill all my emails and all my filters to get kmail working, that has
> sucked. But it's done now and so far it has not crashed in a few days.
> Stick around. I have been on a gnome desktop for a few days and there's not
> much advantage. Really. It's got the same bunch of 'get used to it' bugs and
> oddball corners. You will learn to loath Nautilus too. Mark my words :)
Donn, do you think you could chart all the ways needed to get Konqueror (4.x.x) to function as
v.3.x.x used to? It would be a great benefit to many people on the list.
I really was under the impression that Konq had been hamstrung because the default set up had
disabled so many functions that we users had become used to.
More information about the kubuntu-users